It should come as no surprise to those who know me that I want this house saved. After the Central Elgin council voted 4-3 against protecting the home under Ontario's heritage law - despite Central Elgin's heritage advisory committee's plea for protection - I had resigned myself to the fact that Moore House would soon disappear, like so many of its predecessors, without so much as a commemorative plaque. It seems, however; that I underestimated the public's interest in our region's heritage.
In a letter addressed to Central Elgin's council from Colin Read (former president of the Ontario Historical Society), Read states: "keeping the best structures of the past for the socialization and edification of present and future generations pays large dividends in the form of tourism and, even more importantly, in an enhanced sense of community. This vital lesson is too easily missed by many in these largely ahistorical times." A similar sentiment was expressed in a letter to the editor by Joseph O'Neil, Chair of London's Advisory Committee on Heritage, on September 25th 2007: "The Moore House in Sparta has much deeper significance than just it’s age...Why such history is never taught in our local schools is beyond me, but it is an obvious reason why we have to fight so hard to preserve one of the few remaining links to a magnificent past." These letters were followed by dozens of others from both local and provincial heritage organizations and - in what seems too often a very rare turn of events - actually seem to have had an impact.
On Saturday Sept 22nd 2007, Ontario Culture Minister Caroline Di Cocco issued a stop order on the demolition of Moore House. Though the future of the house remains uncertain (a stop order only prevents demolition for 60 days while the property's historical significance is further reviewed), it is sites such as this which fostered my initial interest in history. Even the temporary protection of Moore House gives me hope for the future of other heritage properties and helps to remind me why making history relevant to non-academic audiences is a noble pursuit.
Image from:
Simunac, Daniela. "Council opts against protection for 183-year-old Moore house." lfpress.com. September 19, 2007. http://lfpress.ca/cgi-bin/publish.cgi?x=articles&p=197395&s=politics (accessed September 28, 2007).
3 comments:
Grace, I am so glad that you are out there protecting heritage sites! You are the real historic avenger! It is really reassuring to know that there are people out there who are interested in history and are trying to save pieces of our heritage. I am glad that the order was suspended, and I hope that the house will be saved. Inspiring people to recognise significant places, people, homes, artefacts, etc. is an excellent occupation, one that I hope Public History as a profession can produce.
I agree with Carrie...furthermore, I think this house owes you one of its' bricks.
Now, here we are in February 2008 and we know that the province worked out a deal with the owner to attach their new house to the old shell but turn the ground floor into a garage! No designation! What would it take to get a designation if this house doesn't deserve it? It has the social, historical, and architectural significance not to mention just shear age! What is it missing to deserve designation?
Let's keep fighting! If we lose this one, no building is safe!
Bob Moore
Post a Comment